![]() Available for Canon, Sigma and Sony 35mm full-frame cameras, the dust and splash-proof Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art lens offers a bright f/2. We find the combination of lab and real-word testing works best, as each reveals different qualities and characteristics. The Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art is the first dedicated 1:1 macro prime lens in Sigmas Art range of premium lenses. Our lab tests are carried out scientifically in controlled conditions using the Imatest testing suite, which consists of custom charts and analysis software that measures resolution in line widths/picture height, a measurement widely used in lens and camera testing. We test lenses using both real world sample images and lab tests. 11-22mm wide-angle and 55-200mm telephoto zooms weighs as little as Sigma’s full-frame 24-70mm lens on its own, with no camera attached. Lens construction: 19 elements in 14 groups. Sigma 150-600 Contemporary vs Sports How we test lenses Better than Canons own 24-70mm lens for full frame Canon DSLRs.Also consider Sigma's more robust Sport version of this lens, the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | S. In order to fit all of that glass inside and keep things sharp and clean the front element has had to grow to a massive 95mm, so get ready to shell out for some more filters if you opt for this lens. Photographers favoring handheld shooting should be aware of the slower maximum aperture of f/6.3 when zoomed in to 600mm but four stops of Optical Stabilization remediates this somewhat. It’s also not overly large to handle either, but definitely much larger than many other, more typical telephotos. Hyper-telephotos are rarely small, but Sigma has done a good job at keeping this lens under the 2kg wire at just 1930g. Read our full Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM review for more details The aperture remains more well-rounded when stopping down a little, compared with Canon’s alternative EF f/1.2 and f/1.8 85mm lenses. The quality of the bokeh is exceptional, with super-smooth blur and particularly minimal longitudinal or ‘bokeh’ fringing. ![]() Wide-aperture sharpness is marginally less magnificent than from the Sigma 85mm Art lens but still pretty extraordinary. It feels well-balanced on chunky full-frame DSLRs like the EOS 5D Mark IV, with excellent handling characteristics. The optical path is based on 14 elements and features Canon’s high-tech Air Sphere Coating which further reduces ghosting and flare.Īt 950g, this lens is smaller and lighter than the competing Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM | A, which lacks stabilization. Build quality is pretty epic, including a shock-absorbing front barrel, weather seals, and fluorine coatings on the front and rear elements. Buy Sigma 24-35mm f/2 DG HSM Art Lens for Canon EF featuring EF-Mount Lens/Full-Frame Format, Aperture Range: f/2 to f/16, Seven SLD Elements, One FLD Element, Three Aspherical Elements, Super Multi-Layer Coating, Hyper Sonic Motor AF System, Rounded 9-Blade Diaphragm. ![]() Unlike many of its rivals, the Canon lens offers the distinct advantage of built-in image stabilization. The idea that you lose money when you abandon a system is poppycock, unless you're the idiot who pays the going retail rate for brand new gear.An 85mm lens is widely thought of as the ideal focal length for portraiture - and this prime offers the advantage of a wide f/1.4 maximum aperture to help you blur the background, and concentrate on the subject's eyes. Paid $1,150, could easily sell today for $1,450. ![]() In fact, the last lens I just bought in September for my Canon EF mount, I could sell in a heartbeat for a $300 profit. I could sell all of my Canon bodies and lenses for almost as much as I paid originally. The second generation (G2) edition of Tamron’s 24-70mm lens is another great buy at the price and, like the Sigma, adds effective image stabilization which is lacking in the own-brand Canon lens. Then when he switched to Sony a few years later, he sold it for over $1,000 more than he paid for it. Shoot with an APS-C or full-frame Canon DSLR camera Discover hundreds of EF and EF-S lenses from Canon, Sigma and. Those who buy intelligently and frugally can usually recoup most, or all, of the money they initially spent on their gear.įor instance, my friend Shawn shopped and shopped and shopped for a great price on a Canon 600mm f4 before he bought one. As wildlife photographers with multiple true supertelephotos, this means they each abandoned over $30,000 in Canon gear to switch to Sony.īy the way, you do NOT lose money when you switch from one system to another. My friend Shawn and my friend Jon both sold off all of their Canon bodies and lenses and replaced them with Sony equivalents. They’ll use their EF glass, maybe buy an RF lens, and wait."ĭavid, not all Canon shooters who threaten to switch are full of shit. No Canon shooter with an EF glass lineup is going to sell it all and move systems. "People claiming to be Canon shooters moving to other brands because of this are full of shit. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |